Sunday, April 13, 2008

Meanwhile, the political fallout for Obama continues

The political woes will keep on coming for Obama. Here's how and why.

Noteworthy:

"The Obama campaign contends that coverage of the San Francisco remarks is overheated and distorted. One aide said that any logical analysis' would make it obvious that the brouhaha will not 'change the pledged delegate count' — the key to the Democratic presidential nomination.

In fact, this is a potential turning point for Obama’s campaign — an episode that could be even more damaging than the attention to remarks by his minister, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, since this time the controversial words came out of his own mouth. "

Here are some of the most important reasons why this episode is a disaster for Obama:

"5. Some hard-working Americans find it insulting when rich elites explain away things dear to their hearts as desperation. It would be like a white politician telling blacks they cling to charismatic churches to compensate for their plight. And it vindicates centrist Democrats who have been arguing for a decade that their party has allowed itself to look culturally out of touch with the American mainstream.

6. It provides a handy excuse for people who were looking for a reason not to vote for Obama but don’t want to think of themselves as bigoted. It hurts Obama especially with the former Reagan Democrats, the culturally conservative, blue-collar workers who could be a promising voter group for him. It also antagonizes people who were concerned about his minister but might have given him the benefit of the doubt after his eloquent speech on race.

8. It helps Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) frame a potential race against Obama, even though both of them have found support among independents. Now Republicans have a simple, easily repeated line of attack to use against Obama as an out-of-touch snob, as they had with Sen. John F. Kerry after he blundered by commenting about military funding, 'I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it.'


11. The story did not have its roots in right-wing or conservative circles. It was published — and aggressively promoted — by The Huffington Post, a liberally oriented organization that was Obama’s outlet of choice when he wanted to release a personal statement distancing himself from some comments by the Rev. Wright.

12. It undermines Democratic congressional candidates who had thought that Obama would make a stronger top for the ticket than Clinton. Already, Republican House candidates are challenging their Democratic opponents to renounce or embrace Obama’s remarks. Ken Spain, press secretary for the National Republican Congressional Committee, said: 'There is a myth being perpetuated by Democrats and even some in the media that an Obama candidacy would somehow be better for their chances down ballot. But we don’t believe that is the case.'"

1 comment:

  1. We finally have the definition from Obama on who the "Typical White Folks" are. Angry, gun toting, Bible reading, church going white folks from small town USA.

    Thank You Sen. Obama for clarifying just who you refer too when spaking of the typical white folks like your grandmomma.

    Slick done talked all the slick off and now he's stuck. I predicted it would happen in a comment last week.

    ReplyDelete