Yes, because he admitted guilt. And considering the strength of the evidence, he's damned lucky to have cut the deal he did.
It's a complicated case, with a lot of political implications for both prosecution and defense that didn't make it into most news accounts, and for once, it looks as if the Times actually got the facts straight.
"When the charges were dismissed ... "
ReplyDeleteYes, because he admitted guilt. And considering the strength of the evidence, he's damned lucky to have cut the deal he did.
It's a complicated case, with a lot of political implications for both prosecution and defense that didn't make it into most news accounts, and for once, it looks as if the Times actually got the facts straight.
You missed the point, Lex.....again.
ReplyDelete