One other thought: If the Times report on the financial program was so bad, what would Laura have to say about the Daily News' report on the plans to flood the Manhattan tunnels? Apparently that story WAS leaked prematurely and DID cause some problems.
But because it was not the Times, it's OK?
(For the record, in hindsight I don't think the Daily News should have published -- at least, not yet -- if the linked report is accurate. That said, it's hard to take seriously a report on any plot predicated on terrorists so evil they could make the Hudson River flow uphill.
Hey, at least the Times held off on reporting on the NSA surveillance program 'til after the 2004 election. You've got to give 'em SOME credit. ;-)
ReplyDeleteOne other thought: If the Times report on the financial program was so bad, what would Laura have to say about the Daily News' report on the plans to flood the Manhattan tunnels? Apparently that story WAS leaked prematurely and DID cause some problems.
ReplyDeleteBut because it was not the Times, it's OK?
(For the record, in hindsight I don't think the Daily News should have published -- at least, not yet -- if the linked report is accurate. That said, it's hard to take seriously a report on any plot predicated on terrorists so evil they could make the Hudson River flow uphill.