"Recent discussions of economic inequality,marked by a lack of clarity and care, have confused the public about the meaning and moral significance of rising income inequality. Income statistics paint a misleading picture of real standards of living and real economic inequality.Other excerpts:
Several strands of evidence about real standards of living suggest a very different picture of the trends in economic inequality. In any case, the dispersion of incomes at any given time has, at best, a tenuous connection to human welfare or social justice. The pattern of incomes is affected by both morally desirable and undesirable mechanisms. When injustice or wrongdoing increases income inequality, the problem is the original malign cause, not the resulting inequality.
Many thinkers mistake national populations for 'society' and thereby obscure the real story about the effects of trade and immigration on welfare,equality, and justice. There is little evidence that high levels of income inequality lead down a slippery slope to the destruction of democracy and rule by the rich.The unequal political voice of the poor can be addressed only through policies that actually work to fight poverty and improve education.
Income inequality is a dangerous distraction from the real problems: poverty, lack of economic opportunity, and systemic injustice."
"If we care about the welfare of the least privileged members of our society, a focus on equality of 'voice' may actually be counterproductive."Indeed.
"Our goal is to make sure that people have meaningful opportunities to make the most of their lives. At best, income inequality is a distraction."
"It is not okay for intellectuals and policymakers to waste time and energy worrying that some people have done too well. It doesn’t help.
Nor does it help to encourage people to concentrate on differences in income, or to resent them. Demoralization and resentment are not what people need. "