But as John Hawkins details for us, "right wing rage" is just a cover-up, and amounts to nothing more than left wing projection.
Noteworthy:
"But the truth is that you don’t have to be angry, loud, hateful, or advocate violence to be a 'loud and angry voice' that 'spreads hate' in the eyes of the left or the media.
You merely have to disagree with them.
People will see that in the near future, when talk radio is hammered for some incident or another — it really doesn’t really matter what specific incident, because the facts will be secondary — and then the left uses the occasion to try to ram through the Fairness Doctrine and clamp down on Limbaugh, Hannity, and others. If you can’t make a better argument, then use the power of government to silence your political opponents.
You can also expect the Democrats to go back to the 'right-wing rage' meme as soon as the glow starts to wear off of Obama. After all, he ran as an 'everything to everyone' candidate. He portrayed himself as a diehard liberal and a moderate, a hawk and a dove, a tax cutting free marketer and a statist, a pragmatist and an idealist, a partisan tough guy and a unifier. No matter what he does, a lot of people are destined to be deeply disappointed in him."
We see a superb example of this particular delusion at work over at our pal Ed Cone's blog, the local Usual Suspect haven for smarmy, arrogant, and narcissitic, pseudo-intellectual "progressive" dweebs. This lefty projection occurs whenever a conservative has the temerity to tell the truth while commenting at that particular den of iniquity.
Rosemary Roberts starting to talk the talk about reducing expectations for Obama, because they are unreasonably high. Well, duh, yes, but who allowed them to be so high in the first place? The MSM was complicit in making Obama FDR and Lincoln rolled all into one, even displaying him on magazine covers as such. It is obvious that a man who hasn't even entered office can not possibly meet expectations, so we will start to see more lessening of expectations.
ReplyDeleteAs well we know, virtually everything (except the left wing dogma) about the Obama campaign was phony, designed to fool the weak-minded/Usual Suspect/Tank Media crowd into placing him in office.
ReplyDeleteGetting rid of expectations is just another way of getting down to the same old business as usual for yet another typical Dem/Lefty/"Progressive" disaster. The Obama presidency will combine the absolute worst elements of the Carter and Clinton presidencies.
"Change We Can Believe In"? That amounts to chump change specifically for the many chumps who voted for him.
Obama's actions and judgment in the less than three weeks since the election show he's just another in a long list of interchangeable demagogues the Dems always manage to run.
Chump Change? No Change. Let's just call it Clinton III .
ReplyDeletePromise the voting dolts anything to get elected, then call in the Clinton's (who've been running the Dem Party for years anyway) to run things into the ground.
ReplyDeleteOh, yeah...change is definitely what we're gonna get--a change back to the Clinton way of doing things.