Key point:
"Stephen Schwartz is a pretty mainstream climate scientist. Yet along with dozens of other studies in the scientific literature, his new study belies Al Gore’s claim that there is no legitimate scholarly alternative to climate catastrophism.
Indeed, if Schwartz’s results are correct, that alone would be enough to overturn in one fell swoop the IPCC’s scientific 'consensus', the environmentalists’ climate hysteria, and the political pretext for the energy-restriction policies that have become so popular with the world’s environmental regulators, elected officials, and corporations. The question is, will anyone in the mainstream media notice?"
morons follow, genius learns, see you still haven't learned anything yet. negatives cannot be proven, only a fool argues against a negative. Won't argue with you, just ask a question, if global warming is not happening then why are Long Island (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6827930/) and bigger (http://archives.cnn.com/2000/NATURE/09/29/iceberg/index.html)
ReplyDeletesize pieces of ice breaking of the Antarctic ice cap? I know it's normal in your view. what a fool
So, anonymous, you rely on MSNBC and CNN to give you accurate scientific information?
ReplyDeleteI'll be you think President Bush blew up the World Trade Center and the New Orleans levees, too, don't you??
Let's re-state the certain truth that NONE of these True Believers can counter:
ReplyDeleteThere is NO empirical evidence that supports "anthropogenic global warming".
None.
Zip.
Zilch.
Nada.
Deal with it......
Jaycee, we can expect more visits from clowns like this.
Some fool on one of the sites that babbles, dribbles, drools and spews about this nonsense linked to me.
Another enviro-wacko hypocrite
ReplyDeleteDo As I Say, Not As I Do