Last Saturday I blogged about Scott Armstrong's challenge to algore, regarding the theology Gore wants to impose on all of us, as the High Priest of the Church of Global Warming.
Read the full report from Armstrong.
Conclusions:
"The Stern Review concluded that, “The scientific evidence is now overwhelming; climate change presents very serious global risks, and it demands an urgent global response” (Stern 2007, p. xv). We have not been able to find any scientific evidence to support such a claim. We can only hope that before committing resources, decision makers will insist on scientific forecasts rather than accept the opinions of some scientists."
"One might say that it is important to consider steps to prevent global warming, but we have the same level of confidence in saying that we should take steps to prevent global cooling. The more important question is 'what is the best way to invest our resources for the benefit of mankind?'"
"Those who advocate various positions on the climate owe it to the people who would be affected by the policies they recommend to base their advocacy on scientific forecasts that address all four of the key areas that are necessary for a rational analysis of the problem."
No comments:
Post a Comment