Friday, February 16, 2007

Regarding "scientific consensus" on "global warming"

J. R. Dunn's articles in The American Thinker hits the nail squarely. Read them here and here.

From the first link:

"What's that? The debate's over, you say? It seems to depend on which scientists you talk to. It's easy to achieve 'consensus' if you only consult people who agree with you."

From the second link:

"A close study of the LCO would prove valuable, not only as regards warming but as an example of human beings living in an environment subtly but definitely different from the one we're used to. But don't expect it anytime soon. The debate, we're told, is over, and the cost of understanding has gotten very high."

No comments:

Post a Comment