Saturday, August 05, 2006

Christianophobia

Dr. Sanity discusses it here, inspired by the article she links to in her blog.

Key point:

"It seems to me that there is a concerted effort to eliminate these values and the symbols of these values wherever they might be found within the culture (e.g., in government logos and such) in an attempt to replace them with different values and symbols. While the stated objective of the replacement is to be "inclusive" and make the U.S. a "multicultural" society (which it always has been without their help), the upshot is a careful substitution of a particular secular set of values for a value system which has its origins in traditional religion."

5 comments:

  1. Bubba, please Google "Christian reconstructionism" and then tell me whether "Dr." Sanity got her PhD at Sears or Target. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  2. And your point is, Lex?

    You DO have a point to make here, do you not?

    It's hard to discern that when you post a comment which does not even attempt to address the material mentioned.

    ReplyDelete
  3. What I'm saying, Bubba, is that when a certain subspecies of Christian really is out to get you, then you're not paranoid.

    That subspecies exists. Although not numerous, it is disproportionately represented in the highest levels of government. It is most definitely not a figment of the moonbats' imagination (although not everything the moonbats attribute to the group actually is the group's responsibility). If not opposed, it will do great damage to both our country and Christianity. And if Dr. Sanity's writing denies that fact, then she's either clueless or lying.

    Clear enough for ya?

    ReplyDelete
  4. "....when a certain subspecies of Christian really is out to get you, then you're not paranoid."

    That's all I really need to know about your opinion on this matter, Lex.

    You ARE paranoid of the Christian Boogeyman.

    Now I understand your asd hominem attempt at snark regarding Dr. Sanity.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Looks like Lex also hasn't seen your post on your blog talking about the Parker article, Glenn.

    ReplyDelete